Traditional shopper
Self-Service shopper
Kiosk error
Checkout staff
Customers are still entering. Watch which lane looks faster once real waits start to diverge.
Simulation Complete
One-hour checkout result with actual queueing, service, and kiosk assist conditions.
Served
0
Total shoppers who completed checkout during the simulated 60-minute window.
Avg wait
0s / 0s
Completed-customer average wait in Traditional first, then Self-Service.
Peak congestion
0 / 100
Highest combined queue-and-blockage pressure reached at any point in the hour.
Owner signals
Workforce vs customer experience
Workforce fit
Balanced
0 / staffed hr
Shows whether the current cashier and Self-Service assist staffing looks lean, balanced, or heavier than needed for this demand.
Queue comfort
Calm
Peak 0 / 0
A simple customer-experience read on whether the hour stayed calm, fair, strained, or risky.
Choice health
Strong
Split 0 / 0
Shows whether both checkout options remained genuinely usable, or whether one side stopped being an attractive choice.
Why Both Options Matter
Better for shoppers and society
Quick route used
0% Self-Service
Simple baskets used the faster option
When some shoppers use Self-Service, short simple trips can finish faster without taking the staffed option away from others.
Staff freed to help
0s
Less routine scanning for staff
Time not spent repeatedly scanning simple baskets can be used for help, approvals, accessibility support, and problem solving.
Cashier option kept
0% Traditional
Human checkout stayed available
Traditional checkout still matters for larger baskets, cash, accessibility needs, or anyone who simply prefers a person.
Queue pulse
1h window
Traditional queue
Self-Service queue
Self-Service assist busyness